Login
|
Subscribe
Search only accepts letters and numbers.
Sunday, August 14, 2022
Home
News
Coronavirus Coverage
State & National Coverage
CDC Coronavirus Microsite
Columns
Brian Howey
Cameron Carter
Linda Chezem
Joshua Claybourn
Jack Colwell
Larry DeBoer
Craig Dunn
Trevor Foughty
Shaw Friedman
Christina Hale
Lee Hamilton
Kelly Hawes
Maureen Hayden
Michael Hicks
Rich James
Terri Jett
David Kitchell
Robert Kraft
Anne Laker
Erin Macey
Morton Marcus
Jay Ruckelshaus
Chris Sautter
Mark Schoeff Jr.
Pete Seat
Curt Smith
Russ Stilwell
Mark Souder
Tony Samuel
Renee Wilmeth
Downloads
HPI Daily Wire
HPI Weekly PDF's
HPI Polling
HPI Poll April 23, 2013
Howey/DePauw Poll November 2, 2012
Howey-Gauge Poll October 28, 2008
Howey/DePauw Poll September 27, 2012
Howey/DePauw Poll May 4, 2012
Howey/DePauw Poll April 5, 2012
Howey-Gauge Poll September 4, 2008
Howey-Gauge Poll April 29, 2008
Member's Archives
2014 Archives - PDF's
2013 Archives - PDF'S
2012 Archives - PDF's
2011 Archives - PDF's
2010 Archives - PDF's
2009 Archives - PDF's
2008 Archives - PDF's
2007 Archives - PDF's
2006 Archives - PDF's
2005 Archives - PDF's
2004 Archives - PDF's
2003 Archives - PDF's
2002 Archives - PDF's
2001 Archives - PDF's
2000 Archives - PDF's
HPI Videos
About
Contact
Subscribe
Michael Hicks: Inflation impacts each family differently
By MICHAEL HICKS
Thursday, June 30, 2022 9:35 AM
MUNCIE – In the past few months, I’ve had several folks ask if recent inflation is the worst it has ever been. To those sweet summer children, I say what should be obvious, inflation has been much worse. That is why economists at the Federal Reserve are burning the midnight oil trying to figure out how much monetary tightening will be needed to prevent it from worsening. A far better question is how does inflation affect the economy, and also, who benefits and who bears the cost?
It’s important to note that inflation has toppled governments, throwing power to ruthless despots from Hitler to Mugabe. And yet, those were events unlike ours in every conceivable way. I have a 1 million Reichmark bank note and a 1 million Zimbabwean dollar note to prove it. Neither of these was worth its face value in toilet paper when printed.
The inflation we suffer is of the more ordinary kind. Year over year, the price level has risen at just over 8% for the last quarter. As I mentioned before, most of that increase is a result of the many steps that the Trump and Biden administrations, Congress and Federal Reserve took to sustain the economy through the COVID-19 pandemic. Some of it is due to real economic shocks, like oil price increases because of Russian attacks on Ukraine.
The Federal Reserve is charged with sustaining price level stability in the U.S. This inflationary period showed them to be less effective than they wished, but I am not sure anyone else would’ve done better. The Russian attack is outside their control, and the official economic data in 2021 was unreliable due to massive job swings after the pandemic. To put it in context, we have a lot more data on earthquakes and hurricanes than we do on inflation, and those phenomena are two things we humans are bad at forecasting. It seems unlikely we can predict inflation spikes any better with today’s understanding of the problem.
We measure inflation by looking directly at prices. The Bureau of Labor Statistics collects data on prices in many different ways. There are price indices on producer prices for hundreds of different products. These tell us the potential for increases in consumer prices in the coming months. For consumer price changes, the BLS constructs a hypothetical ‘basket of goods’ the typical family might buy in a month. There are 400 or so items in that basket. They then collect price data, and make an honest effort to control for changes in the quality of goods.
Most folks tend to focus on gasoline prices because they are so visible, and most consumers have an ‘inelastic’ demand for gasoline. That means they don’t change their buying patterns very much if the price increases. Economists worry about gas prices because transportation costs are part of the cost of making everything.
Inflation affects families differently based on how they save, what they buy, and how they earn their income. The actual effects are pretty surprising and counterintuitive.
Over the long run, inflation penalizes those who save and benefits those who borrow. In particular, anyone borrowing or lending on a long-term fixed-price loan is affected. For example, if you took out a 3.25% 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage last year, your interest rate is currently -5.25%. If you were granted that loan, you are losing money. Again, inflation hurts those who save and helps those who borrow. This mostly benefits less-wealthy households. The effect of inflation on borrowers and lenders is so strong that it was the primary cause of the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s.
Consumers whose monthly consumption looks exactly like the BLS “basket of goods” will experience average inflation. Families who buy products with higher price increases fare worse, and those who buy items that increase in price more slowly do better. In general, this is part of the process of curing inflation, by reducing the demand for items with a more rapid price increase. There is just no way around that, and there is no silver bullet for reducing inflation.
Commodity prices tend to move up and down with more volatility, which means food and fuel prices are more susceptible to inflation. Inflation has a more modest effect on products that can be bought easily at a later date. The ability to defer purchases is a hedge against inflation, but is a double-edged sword. If prices don’t drop, delaying a purchase isn’t much help. Many prices won’t drop, and the BLS “sticky price” index suggests that about half of the inflation increases are more or less permanent.
Inflation also affects families differently due to the ways they earn their incomes. Retirees who live off income from savings are obviously struggling from the secondary effect of a stock market decline. This is offset partially by much more generous cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) increases from Social Security. These are based on a basket of goods that is more sensitive to inflation than the average retiree experiences. Likewise, federal employees and military service members typically have COLA adjustments that are roughly in line with inflation.
State and local government employees almost never see inflation adjustments at this level. Thus state, municipal, and school employees have experienced real pay cuts of 4 to 6% this year and higher next year. This will be particularly acute in states with biennium budgets. For example, Indiana’s teachers will end next year with an inflation-adjusted salary that is perhaps 10% below that of last summer. It may be worse.
Private sector workers in industries with price flexibility will typically fare better than inflation. Firms will have some ability to raise wages in these sectors; whether they do so depends upon how valuable individual employees are to the business. Last month, workers in mining, non-durable goods manufacturing, construction, wholesale trade, logistics, utilities, private sector education and health services and hospitality all saw wage increases. The others all saw wage cuts.
Inflation affects families and businesses differently. For some, especially borrowers it is a short-term panacea, but for most others, it means lower living standards and incomes. Short-term inflation rarely has left lasting damage on an economy, and there are plenty of reasons to think inflation will lessen in the coming months. Long-term inflation slows growth as businesses invest less in the domestic economy. Over time that risks stagflation, which is the combination of inflation and stagnant growth. That would be bad news for everyone.
Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics at Ball State University.
Submit A Comment
Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.
*
indicates a required field
Comment
*
Your Name
Email
Phone
A comment must be approved by our staff before it will displayed on the website.
Submit
X
Christy Stutzman to seek 2nd CD
"This has been such a difficult week and amidst all of the heartbreak, there has been much speculation. I wanted to let everyone know that regarding the caucus and special election to fill the Indiana 2nd Congressional district seat left vacant by the sudden loss of Congresswoman Jackie Walorski, I will be making an announcement next Monday, August 15th. I would ask for your prayers."
- Former Republican legislator
Christy Stutzman
, on Facebook announcing she week seek the open 2nd CD nomination, which the caucus will take place at 11 a.m. Aug. 20.
State Rep. Curt Nisly
filed on Thursday with the Indiana secretary of state's office and Importantville reports that disgraced former attorney general
Curtis Hill
may run. The seat is open due to the death of
U.S. Rep. Jackie Walorski.
Stutzman resigned her Indiana House seat shortly after she was reelected to HD49 in 2020. Hill lost renomination for attorney general in June 2020. Nisly lost his GOP primary race in May.
Dean Swihart,
husband of the late congresswoman, has said he will weigh in to her successor.
HPI Video Feed
Tweets by @hwypol
The HPI Breaking News App
is now available for iOS & Android!
Home
|
Login
|
Subscribe
|
About
|
Contact
© 2022 Howey Politics, All Rights Reserved • Software © 1998 - 2022
1up!
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##