Login
|
Subscribe
GO
Search only accepts letters and numbers.
Sunday, February 17, 2019
Home
News
Columns
Brian Howey
Cameron Carter
Linda Chezem
Joshua Claybourn
Jack Colwell
Larry DeBoer
Craig Dunn
Trevor Foughty
Shaw Friedman
Lee Hamilton
Christina Hale
Maureen Hayden
Michael Hicks
Rich James
Terri Jett
David Kitchell
Robert Kraft
Erin Macey
Morton Marcus
Jay Ruckleshaus
Chris Sautter
Mark Schoeff Jr.
Pete Seat
Russ Stilwell
Mark Souder
Tony Samuel
Renee Wilmeth
Downloads
HPI Daily Wire
HPI Weekly PDF's
HPI Polling
HPI Poll April 23, 2013
Howey/DePauw Poll November 2, 2012
Howey-Gauge Poll October 28, 2008
Howey/DePauw Poll September 27, 2012
Howey/DePauw Poll May 4, 2012
Howey/DePauw Poll April 5, 2012
Howey-Gauge Poll September 4, 2008
Howey-Gauge Poll April 29, 2008
Member's Archives
2014 Archives - PDF's
2013 Archives - PDF'S
2012 Archives - PDF's
2011 Archives - PDF's
2010 Archives - PDF's
2009 Archives - PDF's
2008 Archives - PDF's
2007 Archives - PDF's
2006 Archives - PDF's
2005 Archives - PDF's
2004 Archives - PDF's
2003 Archives - PDF's
2002 Archives - PDF's
2001 Archives - PDF's
2000 Archives - PDF's
HPI Videos
About
Contact
Subscribe
Mark Souder: Race matters in the Donnelly, Braun showdown
BY: MARK SOUDER
Saturday, September 29, 2018 9:30 AM
FORT WAYNE – A modern-day Rip Van Winkle, who just woke up and started to watch ads on television for the Indiana Senate race, might fairly conclude that Hoosiers are obsessing over how to choose between a candidate who had stock in a company run by his brother that had a plant in Mexico and one whose auto supply company sold parts made in China.
While I know some of you may have been losing sleep over this dilemma, it is obviously somewhere between 98% and 100% irrelevant in this race. It was apparent from the day the media first reported about Mexico Joe’s stock and his sale of it, that the ads would be coming. It was also apparent – in fact, I predicted it during the primary campaign – that anyone owning any automobile parts business (actually any retail store) would be vulnerable to a “you sell parts made in China” slam.
But all choices of what ads to run are instructive – about the candidates, about their allies, and frankly about us, the voters.
First, the obvious: Race matters, just talk about it indirectly. John Mutz lost his close gubernatorial race largely because of an ad that attacked him for bringing in a Japanese plant to Tippecanoe County, back when such things were inflammatory. It was a winking reference, but it was effective. Had it been more direct, it could have led to backlash. Instead, it effectively raised the point. The Japanese were getting our money.
If you doubt similar hidden messages in the Indiana Senate race, let’s address the actual substance of the debate briefly (I recognize that the substance is not very relevant). President Trump appears to have renegotiated NAFTA with Mexico. It is those Canadians who are the actual trade problem, at least according to the administration. So the whole Mexico Joe debate is pretty irrelevant.
As for China Mike, the China trade war could fix that problem. We all will just pay a lot more for auto parts, unless his business and others replace Chinese-made parts with slightly higher-priced parts from our new friends in Mexico. That should make everyone happy, if they actually are taking the ads seriously.
On the other hand, we don’t have a deal with Canada yet. In the days immediately following 9/11, as the congressman representing the Fort Wayne area, we had a border problem. Just in time, delivery schedules had jammed up our GM Silverado plant schedules because of parts supply problems. As one former plant manager told me, unofficially, each pick-up made had up to 100 Canadian border crossings involved in the thousands of parts that go into the truck because there were sister operations near Toronto. The plants were synchronized, for many logical business reasons. The American and Canadian auto belts are geographically meshed.
However, there are no ads attacking Canada Mike. They would seem a tad ridiculous. “Mike Braun drinks Tim Hortons coffee” just doesn’t inspire many people to anger. In my decade as part of the U.S.-Canada Parliamentary Exchange, I learned many things. Perhaps the most important can be illustrated by a joke. If you are in a room full of Canadians and Americans, you know the quickest way to identify who is from where? Loudly say: “Americans and Canadians are just alike.” Everyone who objects will be a Canadian. I actually haven’t even met a Canadian who laughed at the joke.
Furthermore, going even a bit deeper into the subject, the majority of Americans – and certainly in Indiana – disagree with the core of our government’s dispute with Canada, imported timber. When we’d argue about this in our cross-border sessions, most of the American congressmen supported the Canadians. In the U.S. our wood supplies are limited for many reasons. A limited supply means dramatically higher prices if we are limited to American timber. Furthermore, as a furniture man (I was in our family’s furniture business for years and on the boards of the Indiana and Midwest Home Furnishings Associations), there are limitations to soft southern pine. And good luck trying to cut down more trees in Oregon, Washington and Northern California.
In other words, the direct threat to the housing industry (homebuilding, realtors, financial institutions) is this misguided fight over timber. Our prices could skyrocket. But I guess it is asking too much for our politicians, or even the media, to understand the debate. And the Canadians make for boring political debate.
The second part of the Mexico Joe-China Mike debate, beyond race, has to do with charges of hypocrisy. Sen. Donnelly knew the border debate was coming so he has morphed into a big defender of reasonably strong borders, though not necessarily of a “wall.” He has always been conservative for a Democrat (easier these days as the party drifts left). But he has not regularly focused on the threat. Thus “Mexico Joe” was seen as a way to highlight the candidate’s differences related to the border. It was also a way to raise DACA without raising DACA.
Raising the China Mike issue was partly defensive on the part of the Donnelly campaign just as Mexico Joe was by Braun. Braun’s campaign knew his vulnerability for purchasing Chinese and Mexican-made parts in this business. But Donnelly’s campaign and allies also mixed this attack into a “blue shirt” attack ad.
The problem with the “blue shirt” attack ad is a rather simple marketing principle which, apparently, they forgot. For example, the attacks on his business practices didn’t work in the primary, and except for union activists (as opposed to the rank and file who voted for Trump) most just viewed them as political charges that roll off as if his blue shirt was Teflon.
But the larger forgotten principle is this: It is very expensive, and usually useless, to try and undo an impression that has been burned into people’s minds with millions of dollars. You must bury it, or all you will do is reinforce the original impression. They are not focusing on those ads enough to bury it, and it is not certain they could anyway. When they run Braun in a blue shirt, the Donnelly campaign might be reinforcing Braun’s original message rather than undoing it. They are incredibly ineffective to anyone except gung-ho Donnelly boosters. It is one reason, in spite of a low visibility campaign with less firepower, Braun remains neck-and-neck with Donnelly. Donnelly is doing some of his advertising.
The real reason this remains a toss-up, though, is spelled with five letters, T-R-U-M-P. Donnelly has desperately tried to localize, Hoosierize, this race for the simple reason that if he can, he will win. People like Joe, I like Joe. People believe Joe has fought for Hoosiers; I believe, and know, that he has. But every day, every hour, nearly every minute, this president manages to dominate all news. Even sports (e.g. the NFL) and weather (e.g. hurricanes). If this race nationalizes, Braun wins.
The Kavanaugh debate has galvanized Republicans. They are now as angry and fired up as the Democrats. How our Senator votes on Kavanaugh may define November’s vote, especially if Kavanaugh is not confirmed. If so, Braun wins.
On the other hand, that assumes that the president doesn’t tweet or say anything else controversial before November. Does anyone think that won’t happen?
Souder is a former Republican congressman from Indiana.
Submit a comment
Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.
Comment
Message is a required field.
Your Name
Email
Phone
Captcha entry is not valid, please try again.
A comment must be approved by our staff before it will displayed on the website.
Submit
X
Pence visits Auschwitz for first time
“It seems to me to be a scene of unspeakable tragedy, reminding us what tyranny is capable of. But it seems to me also to be a scene of freedom’s victory. I traveled in our delegation with people who had family members who had been at Auschwitz — some had survived, some not. But to walk with them and think that two generations ago their forebears came there in box carts and that we would arrive in a motorcade in a free Poland and a Europe restored to freedom from tyranny is an extraordinary experience for us, and I’ll carry it with me the rest of our lives.”
-
Vice President Mike Pence
, who visited the Auschwitz concentration camp in Oswiecim, Poland on Friday along with
Second Lady Karen Pence
and Polish
President Andrzej Duda
and
First Lady Agata Kornhauser-Duda
. It was Pence's first time at the scene where Nazi Germany murdered more than 1.1 million Jews and other groups during the World War II Holocaust.
Our first national park at Indiana Dunes
It continues to amaze me how many folks from central and southern Indiana have never visited Indiana's sea, known to most of us as Lake Michigan. If you need another reason to take a couple hour trip northward on U.S. 31, U.S. 421 or I-65, thank
President Trump
for our first national park. It's now the Indiana Dunes National Park. The move was included in the spending package compromise that Trump signed on Friday, inserted in the legislation with the help of
U.S. Sen. Todd Young
and
U.S. Rep. Pete Visclosky.
Visclosky said, "I also am heartened that because of the support of our U.S. Senators, the entire Indiana Congressional delegation, and numerous Northwest Indiana organizations, we have successfully titled the first National Park in our state. This action provides our shoreline with the recognition it deserves, and I hope further builds momentum to improve open and public access to all of our region’s environmental wonders.”
The Dunes includes white sand beaches, trails and an array of flora and bogs, with a front row seat to the Chicago skyline. It richly deserves to be Indiana's first national park.
- Brian A. Howey, publisher
HPI Video Feed
Tweets by @hwypol
The HPI Breaking News App
is now available for iOS & Android!
Home
|
Login
|
Subscribe
|
About
|
Contact
© 2019 Howey Politics, All Rights Reserved • Software © 1998 - 2019
1up!
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##